This past
week, I have been working on a mock museum curation project about the
Industrial Revolution with my group. Our particular exhibit focused around the
progression of the weaving industry and factories throughout the revolution.
Things started simple with the basic cottager businesses — which consisted of
someone weaving at their house to use for profit— and evolved into efficient
textile mills and factories which mass-produced weaved products and eventually
caused the cottagers to go out of business.
For this
project, we had to do many things to prepare before our exhibit would be
displayed, and one of the most important things for us to do was analyze our
sources. As part of our analysis, we all worked together to figure out what
each source intended to show viewers and what authors of each source wanted the
audience to take away from their work. This process took the longest, but was the
most important part of the project. Analysis is such an important part of the
curation process because, to be a curator, you need to know what you're
presenting to others. If you don't know exactly what each piece in your exhibit
is, how can you even make a claim that the pieces of work featured are
important enough to display? Through our analysis we made sure we all
understood the significance of each piece, and that really helped us with the
creation of the exhibit as a whole.
Our exhibit is
called, "Spinning into the Future; A Woven Destiny", and it included
six pieces/ sources total. We came up with our title after our analysis,
because through our analyzing we realized that each piece had to do with the
evolution of the weaving industry. The sources were about Cottagers, the effect
weaving factories had on Cottagers, John Almonds Hand Loom, the basic loom, and
textile mills. The layout of our pieces is important because it shows the
progression of the weaving industry from simple Cottagers to highly functioning
mills.
The thing I most want people to take away from our exhibit is the idea that everything had to do with progress in the Industrial Revolution, and I hope that our layout helps contribute to that idea, along with the placards.
Here is a picture of our exhibit:
The four exhibits I got to observe were all very well done, and I was able to extract valuable information about the Industrial Revolution from each one.
The first exhibit I saw, "Hot Stuff: How the Steam Engine Fired Up the Industrial Revolution" explored the idea of steam engines and their impact on transportation. From the placards, I was able to gather that over time steam engines and canals became the main method of transportation, and because they were so advanced and foreign to people, many were skeptical of them. There were two poems included in the project, both having to do with new transportation, and those really helped me grasp just how revolutionary the steam engine was for people. Below, I have included a picture of a diagram of how a steam engine works. I found it really interesting and I never would have known this was the way a steam engine worked had it not been included in the project.
The second
exhibit I observed was, “All Work, No Play; A Look at Child Labor during the
Industrial Revolution”. The curators did a great job of organizing their
project in an effective and creative way, making it easy for observers to
obtain the information about child labor during the Industrial Revolution. I
had always known that working conditions for children were terrible, but I had
no idea that they would go so far as to strap children in leather harnesses and
force them to pull things like mules.(See picture below) The group did a great
job providing examples of child labor, such as how children were forced to work
on unsafe machines because they were small and able to fit on top of things
easily. I also really liked how they included information on the Factory Act of
1833 which was a document that prevented young kids from working in dangerous
factories, and made it illegal for children to work for more than 12 hours a
day and 69 hours a week.
"Cotton
or Freedom? You decide:" provided great insight into how the cotton
industry worked and how slaves were affected. The curators gave a great
explanation of how slavery played a part in the Industrial Revolution, and I
found out that the entire concept was able to come full circle; slavery
produced cotton, cotton produced money, money produced factories, and factories
produced slavery, which is what it started with. There was a chart that showed
the increase in slave population which I found to be a really helpful and great
addition because it gave me a way to physically see how as the slave population
grew. (See picture below)
The final
exhibit I visited was "The Dark Side of the Industrial Revolution",
and it really opened my eyes. It explored the positive and negative effects of
the industrial revolution, focusing on how as the revolution grew, so did the
levels of pollution. While it was great that new inventions were made and
production was increasing, so was pollution, and soon enough, English cities
were covered with thick black smoke. There was one picture I included below
because I thought it really emphasized the idea of pollution, and with the gray
sky it gives me a good idea of just how bad it was.
I really
enjoyed this process of curating and spectating. Through looking through other
group's projects, I saw that there were a lot of ideas other groups used that
we had used in our exhibit, while there were also a lot of cool methods of
organization I wished we had used in ours. Over all, I was really impressed
with all of the exhibits and I feel I've learned a great deal about the
industrial revolution from the walk through and also through the work I did
with my group to create our own exhibit.

No comments:
Post a Comment